Swords and sandals classic collection save corruption

SWORDS AND SANDALS CLASSIC COLLECTION SAVE CORRUPTION FULL

Better: real society is losing interest in the political class, while nonetheless availing itself of the spectacle. The immunity of the one creates a reciprocal immunity in the other вЂ“ a mirror indifference. This paradoxical situation is in a sense beneficial: it protects civil society (what remains of it) from the vicissitudes of the political sphere, just as it protects the economy (what remains of it) from the random fluctuations of the Stock Exchange and international finance. It is the same in the political sphere: scandals, corruption and the general decline in standards have no decisive effects in a split society, where responsibility (the possibility that the two parties may respond to each other) is no longer part of the game. But the two are so disconnected that the misfortunes which beset that capital вЂ“ stock market crashes and other financial debacles вЂ“ do not bring about the collapse of real economies any more.

On the one hand, the battered remnants of production and the real economy on the other, the circulation of gigantic amounts of virtual capital. In some cases, additional information was sought from civil society organisations and human rights defenders directly.вЂњWe find the same situation in the economy. In order for a case to be included in this research, it must have been reported in at least two reliable sources and met the definition used for this research.

This research is based on a review of media sources, NGO reports and websites, and social media posts in English, Spanish and French.

SWORDS AND SANDALS CLASSIC COLLECTION SAVE CORRUPTION FULL

However, we recognise that many SLAPPs were filed before 2015 and so our research provides a limited picture of the full scale of SLAPPs. Our dataset includes cases filed from JanuвЂ“, as this aligns with the period during which the Resource Centre has tracked attacks against human rights defenders. If the names of all seven individuals were publicly shared, this would be counted as seven cases.

For example, if a lawsuit was brought against seven individuals, but only one personвЂ™s name is shared through public sources, weвЂ™ve counted this as only one case. In this research, we consider each individual or organisation sued as a вЂњcaseвЂќ when the name is publicly available.

The tactic can drain the resources of community members, environmental advocates, and journalists who speak out in support of human rights and the environment and have a broader chilling effect, deterring others from speaking out against risks or abuse. Strategic lawsuits against public participation, criminal or civil lawsuits brought or initiated by business actors to intimidate critics, are one form of attack that defenders face. Protecting these defendersвЂ™ freedom of expression and association is crucial to our democracies, transparency in markets, and protection of workers and communities.Д®very day across the globe, defenders who bravely speak out against injustice face a range of attacks for the mere reason of raising concerns about human rights risks and harms associated with business practices. Human rights defenders are at the forefront of peacefully promoting and protecting our human rights, natural resources, and shared planet, as well as playing a vital role in calling out the harm created by irresponsible business practices.

Swords and sandals classic collection save corruption